<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Local Search Optimization -  Martijn Beijk &#187; oneboxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/tag/oneboxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martijnbeijk.com</link>
	<description>Local SEO, Web Analytics and Blended Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:21:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>SEO oneboxes &#8211; not only in Duluth</title>
		<link>http://www.martijnbeijk.com/seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth</link>
		<comments>http://www.martijnbeijk.com/seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>martijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oneboxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martijnbeijk.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following Mike&#8217;s example of Google still showing oneboxes on SEO related terms (which they banished some time ago ) I found another example where google decides to put up the onebox. Considering the Guidelines for inclusion in Google Maps you might find this example particularly funny. or check out this one on webdesign and positioning [...]</p><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.martijnbeijk.com">Local Search - martijnbeijk.com</a>

<br/><br/><a href="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth/">SEO oneboxes &#8211; not only in Duluth</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/onebox-seo-maps.png" width="240" />
		</p><p>Following <a title="SEO oneboxes" href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/02/26/are-the-seo-oneboxes-returning-to-the-google-serps-nah-exept-in-duluth/">Mike&#8217;s example</a> of Google still showing oneboxes on SEO related terms (which they <a href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/31/google-to-seos-designers-advertising-agents-you-are-off-the-map/">banished</a> some time ago ) I found another example where google decides to put up the onebox. Considering the Guidelines for inclusion in Google Maps you might find this example particularly funny.<br />
<img src="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/onebox-seo-maps.png" alt="SEO oneboxes barcelona" /><br />
<span id="more-595"></span><br />
or check out this one on webdesign and positioning in Google<br />
<img src="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/posicionamiento-google-webdesign.png" alt="DiseÃƒÂ±o web" /></p>
<p>It appears that a lot of this still possible in many countries! Google should be proactively stating at the submission process what can and what can&#8217;t be done according to the Google Guidelines.<br />
Have you seen more interesting examples?</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.martijnbeijk.com">Local Search - martijnbeijk.com</a>

<br/><br/><a href="http://www.martijnbeijk.com/seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth/">SEO oneboxes &#8211; not only in Duluth</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martijnbeijk.com/seo-oneboxes-not-only-in-duluth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

